<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>insignificances &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insignificances.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insignificances.com</link>
	<description>same old same old – new wrapping, though</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:32:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Friend Connect: A traffic booster</title>
		<link>http://insignificances.com/2009/05/30/google-friend-connect-a-traffic-booster/</link>
		<comments>http://insignificances.com/2009/05/30/google-friend-connect-a-traffic-booster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 11:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jarle Petterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insignificances.com/?p=2425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p> <p>I&#8217;ve never had the pleasure of counting myself among the <a title="The Alexa Top 100" href="http://www.alexa.com/topsites">Alexa elite</a> (as a matter of fact, this blog <a title="My Alexa ranking" href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/insignificances.com">holds a humble 8763rd place</a> – among sites Norwegians visit). Never paid much attention to search engine optimisation, commenting wildly on other bloggers&#8217; posts for requital [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://insignificances.com/no/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/charts.jpg" alt="Charts" width="590" height="330" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never had the pleasure of counting myself among the <a title="The Alexa Top 100" href="http://www.alexa.com/topsites">Alexa elite</a> (as a matter of fact, this blog <a title="My Alexa ranking" href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/insignificances.com">holds a humble 8763rd place</a> – among sites<em> Norwegian</em>s visit). Never paid much attention to search engine optimisation, commenting wildly on other bloggers&#8217; posts for requital traffic, unless I should, for other reasons, but I do appreciate frequent visitors and love the input you provide, unless you&#8217;re <a title="Threatening comment" href="http://insignificances.com/?p=2428&amp;cpage=1#comment-550">up to no good</a>, that is.</p>
<p>In short, my insignificances are indeed highly insignificant, in the big picture that is the blogosphere, but I cherish my readers, who, more often than not, provide additional facts to my posts – or correct them, even, which is even better. There&#8217;s no better way to expand your horizon than to have your own misconceptions rectified, no matter how embarrassing at the time. Which is why I&#8217;m pleased to pride myself with a highly competent parish, whose <em>own</em> blogs I admire immensely.</p>
<p>Even though my traffic figures have been and remain modest, I&#8217;ve discovered that there&#8217;s really nothing to boost traffic, if that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re after – provided you have the time, unfortunately a very sparse commodity, to actually maintain the blog regularly.</p>
<p>Seeing as I prefer quality over quantity, I broke my stride the other week somehow,  on deciding to experiment with a somewhat more popular – some would say <em>common</em> – approach, delving into the realms of popular culture. Which, believe you me, is a lot easier in Norwegian, as we Norwegians do not much care for high brow phenomena, save for the odd occasion when, for one reason or the other, we&#8217;re flaunting our faux intellectualism. In reality we&#8217;re every bit as commercially inclined as the outrageous Americans. The decision was made: I was determined to attract the salt of the earth by blogging a few posts of monumental interest to the average news reader (useful information: Hereabouts the term &#8220;news&#8221; refers to entertainment, celebrities and the &#8220;heinous Muslim immigrants&#8221;).</p>
<p>My blog boasts a meagre average of some 500 visits a day (not unique), but on 20 April  I published a post on the Pirate Bay verdict (in Norwegian), which was all over the place, linking liberally to every <a title="Twingly" href="http://www.twingly.com/">Twingly-enabled</a> news outlet, thereby securing a minor boost in reciprocal traffic, to 2252 visits and 10,475 page views that day, an exercise I repeated on several occasions, in relation to other popular subjects, such as Norway&#8217;s Eurovision Song Contest contender, who accidentally won the whole thing (did I remember to inform you that Norwegian news are all entertainment, celebrities et cetera?).</p>
<p>As you will see from this table, activity was extremely low during the year&#8217;s two initial months, until a gradual increase became evident as of March:</p>
<p><img title="Trafic figures for Insignificances as of May 2009." src="http://insignificances.com/no/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/trafikktall_mai_09.gif" alt="Significant raise in trafic figures from March to April." width="590" height="113" /></p>
<p>The May figures aren&#8217;t complete at the moment, but with all probability end at approximately 10,000 unique visitors. Still not impressive, but I&#8217;m more than happy. A monthly average from just below 1000 unique monthly visitors to say 11,000, wouldn&#8217;t be possible for a fairly new blog, such as this (launched in the end of last September, with moderate activity), if it hadn&#8217;t been for the Twingly trackbacks and Google Friend Connect. Here&#8217;s an interesting piece of information, see:</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Google Friend Connect." src="http://insignificances.com/no/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/google_friend_connect.gif" alt="" width="302" height="227" />Of the above shown figures, some 48,5 percent are referred from my very limited participation in the <a title="Google Friend Connect" href="http://www.google.com/friendconnect/">Google Friend Connect network</a> – among those actually referred from elsewhere, that is. I&#8217;ve joined a very moderate number of blogs, as follower, if you will. All blogs that I <em>intend</em> to follow, mind you (joining those you don&#8217;t care much to follow, simply in order to attract reciprocal traffic, would be a little overzealous, in my opinion).</p>
<p>In other words, if increasing traffic figures is a goal in itself, I really ought to join more sites – via Google Friend Connect. As the screendump to the left (or the real deal in the lower end of my sidebar) shows, I haven&#8217;t got more than 13 followers to show for myself, me included. Followers who undoubtedly have come to much of the same conclusion; that Google Friend Connect indeed is a proverbial lifesaver, in terms of traffic figures.</p>
<p>In fact, I&#8217;m amazed that very few blogs seem to have discovered. If you don&#8217;t have one, <a title="Google Friend Connect" href="http://www.google.com/friendconnect/">Go get</a>. If you&#8217;d like to assist fellow bloggers in their attempts at improving visits, that is. If you&#8217;re all about attracting traffic to yourself: joining blogs who <em>have</em> it is an alternative, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insignificances.com/2009/05/30/google-friend-connect-a-traffic-booster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impressive free simulation</title>
		<link>http://insignificances.com/2009/05/21/impressive-free-simulation/</link>
		<comments>http://insignificances.com/2009/05/21/impressive-free-simulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 07:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jarle Petterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insignificances.com/?p=2407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p> <p>The Kiwi software development company <a title="Planet in action" href="http://planetinaction.com/">Dinther Product Design</a> launched the first version of its free ship simulation, <a title="Ships" href="http://ships.planetinaction.com/">Ships</a>, the other day, which leverages on the browser-based Google Earth plugin as the primary graphics engine, according to the <a title="http://www.gearthblog.com/blog/archives/2009/05/fantastic_free_google_earth_game_sh.html" href="http://www.gearthblog.com/blog/archives/2009/05/fantastic_free_google_earth_game_sh.html">Google Earth Blog</a>.</p> <p>First of all, let me point [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2408" title="google_earth_ships" src="http://insignificances.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/google_earth_ships.jpg" alt="google_earth_ships" width="590" height="330" /></p>
<p>The Kiwi software development company <a title="Planet in action" href="http://planetinaction.com/">Dinther Product Design</a> launched the first version of its free ship simulation, <a title="Ships" href="http://ships.planetinaction.com/">Ships</a>, the other day, which leverages on the browser-based Google Earth plugin as the primary graphics engine, according to the <a title="http://www.gearthblog.com/blog/archives/2009/05/fantastic_free_google_earth_game_sh.html" href="http://www.gearthblog.com/blog/archives/2009/05/fantastic_free_google_earth_game_sh.html">Google Earth Blog</a>.</p>
<p>First of all, let me point out that I was never much of a gamer, save for a brief Amiga period some 20 years ago, but this one actually had me impressed. Not so much by the game&#8217;s features and functionality perhaps as by its availability, as a free of charge offer based on third party R&amp;D and development, such as Google&#8217;s ever-improving Google Earth.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve used Google Earth before, you already know some of the drill. Type in any location in the world (or click on it on the map), and you&#8217;re there. Personally I couldn&#8217;t resist ordering a huge container vessel to the Oslo harbour, as seen in this screendump:</p>
<div id="attachment_2411" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 600px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2411" title="google_earth_ships2" src="http://insignificances.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/google_earth_ships2.jpg" alt="A container vessel next to Oslos Aker Brygge." width="590" height="330" /><p class="wp-caption-text">A container vessel next to Oslo&#39;s Aker Brygge.</p></div>
<p>As you will see from the above screendumps, Ships is nowhere near the realistic experience you get from simulation programmes applied in commercial training, but it <em>is</em> great fun, offering different angles and vantage points, a selection of vessel classes, close to realistic navigation features (but no cigar) and, above all, hours of fun, if you&#8217;re so inclined.</p>
<p>I suppose it&#8217;s pretty obvious by now that I have no future as a gaming critic, but I thought you might be interested. <a title="Ships" href="http://ships.planetinaction.com/">Please check it out</a> (requires that you download the Google Earth plugin). Before you do, you may find this brief walk-through interesting, though:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AQXvHSf3yQ&#038;fmt=18">www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AQXvHSf3yQ</a></p>
<p><em><strong>Top photo:</strong> Screendump from Ships, showing the &#8220;Queen Mary 2&#8243; in Rotterdam.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insignificances.com/2009/05/21/impressive-free-simulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My next mobile is an Android</title>
		<link>http://insignificances.com/2008/09/24/my-next-mobile-is-an-android/</link>
		<comments>http://insignificances.com/2008/09/24/my-next-mobile-is-an-android/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jarle Petterson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insignificances.com/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p> <p>There can be no doubt. After seeing a brief walk-through of Google&#8217;s Android platform, I know, with something very close to a 100 percent certainty, that my next mobile is very likely to be an Android. German (US-based) T-Mobile launched their HTC-manufactured <a title="T-Mobile G1" href="http://www.t-mobileg1.com/?WT.mc_t=OnsiteAd&#38;WT.mc_n=G1PreRegProspect_home1">G1</a> yesterday, sporting Google&#8217;s brand new, Linux-based Android platform, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-239" title="android" src="http://insignificances.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/android.jpg" alt="Google's Android mobile platform" width="590" height="288" /></p>
<p>There can be no doubt. After seeing a brief walk-through of Google&#8217;s Android platform, I know, with something very close to a 100 percent certainty, that my next mobile is very likely to be an Android. German (US-based) T-Mobile launched their HTC-manufactured <a title="T-Mobile G1" href="http://www.t-mobileg1.com/?WT.mc_t=OnsiteAd&amp;WT.mc_n=G1PreRegProspect_home1">G1</a> yesterday, sporting Google&#8217;s brand new, Linux-based Android platform, and I have to tell You: For my purposes this beats the crap out of Apple&#8217;s latest iPhone. An absolute must-have if you&#8217;re depending on net-based applications in your everyday life, which I do. But I can tell you this, too: I&#8217;m in no hurry, since 1) Android-enabled mobiles won&#8217;t be available on the Norwegian market until sometime early next year (at the earliest), and 2) I&#8217;m not in the habit of buying goodies the minute they&#8217;re introduced to same market.</p>
<p>Desirable products are introduced to consumers on a near daily basis, and truth be told, I&#8217;m quite happy with my now soon one year old mobile. There are numerous reasons why you shouldn&#8217;t frequently renew your gadget armoury. I, for one, simply cannot afford to, and if I did, I&#8217;d think twice before polluting our environment with more electronic waste than absolutely necessary.</p>
<p>Of course, you&#8217;ll have to weigh the impact on your work-effienecy against all that, and in my case this constitutes a huge improvement, so we&#8217;ll just see. Affordable, too, at about USD 179 (in America, of course). As for the improved productivity… What can I say, that hasn&#8217;t already been said:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7qbPa1O8Ys&#038;fmt=18">www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7qbPa1O8Ys</a></p>
<p>So yes, I think I&#8217;m going for an Android mobile, unless something better comes along. But that&#8217;s it, isn&#8217;t it: Something always does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insignificances.com/2008/09/24/my-next-mobile-is-an-android/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

